Independence Convention invites Lib Dems to join
Joe Middleton's Scottish News and Videos blog. Clippings, comment and films on Scottish Independence and Scottish Politics.
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
3:19 PM
0
comments
http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/57579.html
Yet another step towards declaring independence?
Iain MacWhirter March 08 2006
My Lords Steel and Vallance make unlikely revolutionaries, but their commission's report on the future of the Scottish constitution is little short of a declaration of independence. Giving Scotland control of taxation, broadcasting, welfare, immigration, asylum, the civil service, the constitution and many other powers would amount to a lot more than "fiscal federalism", whatever that means. Under their plan, Scotland's government would even have its own borrowing powers and a national debt. It's difficult to think of what Westminster would have left to do, apart from start wars. Now, there has been much scoffing about how passé Lord Steel's report is; that there's little demand in Scotland for more constitutional upheavals, especially with the roof falling in at Holyrood.However, it would be unwise to dismiss the Steel Commission Report as the misguided musings of a home-rule romantic. Critics said much the same about the last big constitutional report Lord Steel chaired – that of the Scottish Constitutional Convention in 1988. It called for a Scottish parliament with full legislative powers to be elected by proportional representation. It'll never fly, we were told . . .These things have a way of creeping up on you. The Scottish people may not be taking to the streets to demand more powers for Holyrood but nor did they for devolution. In Scotland, constitutional change happens incrementally, through the formation of broad coalitions, almost by stealth. And look around: a majority of the MSPs in the Scottish Parliament already support the powers of Holyrood being extended. The political reality is that they almost certainly will be – sooner or later.Devolution was always a process rather than an event and we live in rapidly changing times. David Cameron, the Tory leader, is on record as supporting greater powers for the Scottish Parliament and a new constitutional settlement to take account of anomalies such as the West Lothian Question. The Liberal Democrats have a new leader in Menzies Campbell who served on the original Scottish Constitutional Convention and has a rare intellectual grasp of the issues.It is quite possible there could be a coalition in Westminster after the next general election – even Professor John Curtice says so. Labour need drop only 33 seats and Gordon Brown would find himself a leader bereft of a working majority. Brown is, of course, a long-time supporter of devolution and any talks between him and Menzies Campbell about a UK coalition would inevitably involve the proposals in the Steel Commission.Indeed, one way of looking at this week's report is that it's an opening bid in these very negotiations. It is a set of constitutional demands deliberately set high to allow room for movement. I cannot, for example, see any Westminster government handing powers over immigration and asylum to Scotland. Or rather, I could, but it would mean setting up border controls at Gretna Green.Given the government's sensitivity over immigration, revealed yesterday by Charles Clarke's new points system for immigrant workers, Westminster will not want to see foreigners entering the country through the Scottish back door. However, there could be some further modification of the points system to give it more of a regional bias.Similarly, Gordon Brown would be reluctant to give full tax-raising powers to the Scottish Parliament. But again, there could be scope for bargaining here – perhaps a concession on corporate taxation. Remember the Scottish Parliament already possesses the power to vary income tax by three pence in the pound – a power it has never used. It's not inconceivable Prime Minister Brown might go along with the idea of the Scottish Parliament setting tax rates, provided it didn't involve setting up a rival Inland Revenue. The Barnett Formula, which currently shares revenue on a per capita basis, has outserved its usefulness and will almost certainly be reformed in the next parliament.Brown – assuming he is returned as prime minister – might anyway have no choice but to accept greater Scottish autonomy. It will loom large in the negotiations for forming a new Scottish coalition after the 2007 Holyrood elections. The Steel Report, commissioned by the Liberal Democrats, represents the kind of terms Nicol Stephen will be set for Jack McConnell for any future Lib-Lab partnership agreement. We thought they had got everything they ever wanted from Labour, but not so.And, of course, if there is no Lib-Lab coalition, then the Steel Report could form the basis of an alternative SNP-Lib-Green coalition in Holyrood. Labour has no freehold on office and McConnell need lose only half-a-dozen seats for the non-Labour parties to be within sight of a non-Labour administra-tion. An alternative coalition must happen eventually.The SNP has been careful not to speak too enthusiastically about Steel's agenda but it is right up Alex Salmond's street. He might even get the SNP to shelve its demand for a referendum on independence – the main obstacle between the SNP and the LibDems – on the grounds the Steel Report is only a couple of steps away from it.And the Tories? Well, as their deputy leader, Murdo Fraser, made clear at the weekend, even the Scottish Tories are conquering their fear of nationalism and are willing to contemplate a "business pact" with the SNP. An extraordinary development, which would have been unthinkable 10 years ago. The Steel Report would provide much of the intellectual groundwork for such an arrangement. We really are in a very difficult political game, north and south of the border.But merely stating the possible political configurations in Westminster and Holyrood is missing the point, because the main reason the Steel Report should be taken seriously is the force of its argument. It's all a matter of respect. The Scottish Parliament needs to find some way of moving on from the present transitional status of financial dependency, or financial delinquency.Lord Steel is right to say, "no self-respecting parliament should expect to exist permanently on 100% handouts determined by another parliament".Scottish politicians will never be taken seriously, or take themselves seriously, until they are responsible for raising the taxpayer's money they are spending. This is what accountability really means. In curious way, local government is actually more responsible in Scotland than the Scottish Executive – at least councils raise part of their revenue and have to answer for their spending decisions at election time.And there's another reason the Steel Report demands attention. Its call for a written constitution for the UK, to take account of devolution and revive parliamentary democracy, is shared by many people of all parties who believe the relationship between government and the people is out of kilter. The decline of parliament and the cabinet and the rise in prime-ministerial power has provoked a crisis of legitimacy, seen most strikingly in the Iraq war.As long-cherished freedoms are eroded, day by day, by a PM who rules like an elective monarch, we need a more solid foundation for our liberties.Even Gordon Brown has accepted the constitution needs to be looked at to address public cynicism and mistrust. Where better to address these issues than in a new constitutional convention for the UK. It could be an idea whose time has come – again.
Herald Letter, Thu Mar 9, 2006
IAIN Macwhirter makes some important points. Most importantly thatLabour on present trends in by-elections could lose control atHolyrood and Westminster at the next elections. In that situation theneverything including the constitutional settlement will be up fornegotiation, and it may be that even independence is on the agenda. Atpresent there are 46 MSPs in favour of independence in the ScottishParliament; it only takes 19 more to win a majority for independence.As we have seen in the past few years the Liberals are infinitelyflexible over policy in their desire for getting into government andthey may go along with a referendum over independence.
The Scottish Socialist Party conference at the weekend gave its fullbacking to the Independence Convention. With this and the backing ofthe SNP, the Greens and many Independents then the convention couldcome to dominate Scottish politics over the next year: 2007 is exactly300 years since we "were bought and sold for English gold". It could be the beginning of the end of the British state.
Hugh Kerr, 31 Melville Street, Kilmarnock.
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
10:21 AM
0
comments
World in peril, Chomsky tells overflow crowd
By Brian Liberatore Press & Sun-Bulletin
03/05/06 "Press & Sun-Bulletin " -- --There are dire consequences to the current direction of the U.S. foreign policy, said Noam Chomsky in a speech Saturday at Binghamton University. Among those consequences, he said, is a nuclear Armageddon.
"Under the current U.S. policies, a nuclear exchange is inevitable," the 77-year-old MIT professor said in his presentation, "Imminent Crises: Paths Toward Solutions." He spoke to an over-capacity crowd in BU's Osterhout Concert Theater.
Chomsky cited nuclear proliferation and environmental collapse as the two greatest crises that "literally threaten survival."
Since the 1960s Chomsky, a widely acclaimed professor of linguistics, has crusaded against political contradiction, nuclear proliferation and Israel's treatment of Palestinians. Regarded by many as the greatest intellectual alive today and dismissed by others as a radical, Chomsky has voiced harsh criticism against the foreign policy of the United States since World War II.
About 1,500 people crammed into the main theater, while a television broadcast the speech to a room of about 500 next door. Ushers were forced to turn hundreds of people away as the building filled beyond its capacity.
Asked whether he had anticipated the number of people, the building's operations director, Darryl Wood, responded, "Not this many, no."
Inside the theater, Chomsky delivered an account of the world's ills. He addressed the history of the Iraq conflict, the unrest it has fostered, and Iran's intentions for nuclear armament - a path, he said, that is directly tied to U.S. aggression in the Middle East. Chomsky outlined a course of action. "All of this is under our control if we're not willing to observe passively and obediently," he said. "Take democracy seriously."
Peter Klotz drove two hours from Siena College in Loudonville to see the professor. "He knows what he's talking about," Klotz said. "His ideas are certainly not new, but he presents things in a very concise manner."
John Hamilton, who drove from Ithaca to see Chomsky, stood up to ask a question during the question-and-answer period following Chomsky's speech. "My question is, what do you find hopeful?" Hamilton said.
"I think one should be very optimistic for the reasons I just mentioned," Chomsky said. "The large majority of the population already agrees with the things activists are committed to. All we have to do is organize people who are convinced."
© 2006 Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
1:03 PM
1 comments
Backing for pro-independence stance
Scottish Socialist members have backed party bosses over their role in the Independence Convention - despite fierce opposition among some sections of the SSP. The convention, launched on November 30 last year, brought together the SSP and the other main pro-independence parties, the SNP and Scottish Greens.
The SSP annual conference in Dundee's Caird Hall endorsed a motion by the party's executive committee, instructing it to remain in the convention. Some members had demanded that all convention participants sign up to an independent republic, while others insisted the SSP should not co-operate at all with "pro-business" parties.
However, SSP press and policy co-ordinator and former leadership candidate Alan McCombes insisted the SSP must be on the "front line" of the drive for independence. Mr McCombes acknowledged that the SSP's vision of an independent Scotland - a socialist republic - was "radically different" from the other two parties.
And he denied the SSP had "blurred" the ideological differences between itself and these parties.
But achieving a socialist society would require a "prolonged battle for the hearts and minds" of Scots over many years, Mr McCombes told delegates.
"In the meantime there may be the possibility after 2007 or after 2011 of moving towards Scottish independence - of fracturing the British state. The fracturing of the British state can help accelerate the long-term drive for socialism - provided that the socialist forces are on the front line of the battle for independence itself."
© Copyright Press Association Ltd 2006, All Rights Reserved.
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
10:21 AM
0
comments
Public 'want more assembly power'
By Guto Thomas BBC Wales political correspondent
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/4759946.stm
A majority of people believe Wales should have either a full law-making and tax-varying parliament, or be an independent nation, a poll has found. A St David's Day poll for BBC Wales also suggested that 60% of people think the assembly government should have the most influence over Welsh life.
But 80% did not think £67m should have been spent on the new Senedd building.
The BBC commissioned poll by ICM Research spoke to over 1,000 people across Wales over three days last week.
According to the poll's findings, public opinion in Wales seems to be moving in favour of devolution and an increasing majority of people want that process to accelerate significantly.
Back in 1997, when the Labour government began to implement the devolution process, almost 40% in Wales were firmly against the creation of any kind of assembly, while fewer than 20% wanted a full law-making parliament.
Figures reversed
However, according to the St David's Day poll, these figures have now been completely reversed - with just 20% wanting to abolish the assembly, 21% wanting to keep the status quo, 39% want a more powerful parliament (with full law-making and tax-varying powers), and 16% in favour of independence.
This suggests that 55% of people in Wales - a clear majority - now want significantly more devolution.
Interestingly, the poll also shows stronger support from women for a parliament, and a clearer advocacy of abolition among men.
The poll also reveals that 60% believe the Welsh Assembly Government should have the most influence over Wales, compared to just 21% who think the UK Government in Westminster should have the most influence.
New building
Asked about their perception of the current situation in 2006, only 40% thought the UK Government has the most influence - despite the fact that it still retains all primary legislation and taxation powers.
Moreover, given that back in 2001, nearly 65% said the UK Government had the most influence over Wales, then this suggests a further erosion in how people view the UK Government's role in life in Wales.
The pollsters also asked people about their feelings about the new assembly building.
Despite all the publicity surrounding the Senedd over a period of many years, 23% said they were not aware that the assembly had a new home at all.
Appropriate name
Of those questioned, 56% felt it was right for the assembly to have a new building, with 38% against.
But when it was pointed out that the building cost £67m, a massive 80% said that paying this amount for a new building was not worth it.
A significant 58% said the name Senedd is an appropriate name for the new building - with the highest level of support amongst people aged between 18 and 34.
However, almost a third said that the name was inappropriate, providing some more ammunition for both sides in the ongoing debate about the name of the new building.
http://www.theherald.co.uk/politics/57216-print.shtml
Why Wales wants more TOM GORDON March 02 2006 Amid the unseasonal St David's Day snows, on a slate-covered dockside overlooking Cardiff Bay, the Queen yesterday opened the extraordinary new home of the National Assembly for Wales.It was a significant day for the country's devolution process, which began alongside Scotland's in 1997.At the heart of the Senedd, a £67m box of glass and rippling wood designed by Lord Richard Rogers, is the debating chamber. To Scots eyes, it looks uncannily like a whisky still.At the bottom of its round belly, 60 politicians sit in a tight circle, while above them, made from planks instead of copper, a 30ft funnel tapers skywards.Half-way up the vessel a glass band allows the public to peer down on the bilingual proceedings from a darkened gallery.Like Holyrood, the building began with high hopes, a signature architect and iconic design, only to descend into farcical delays and costs. It opens four years late and more than five times over budget.There has even been a ding-dong over the building's name. Senedd, Welsh for senate or parliament, has been adopted, even though, as some Labour politicians point out, it is still only an assembly, or Cynulliad.But there the familiarity ends. For while the Scottish experience of devolution has been relatively stable, in Wales it has been an unholy mess.The Scottish Constitutional Convention had for years scoped out the basis for devolution, building up a cross-party consensus. There was no equivalent in Wales. The result was a lukewarm public reception – the yes vote for an assembly was just 50.3% on a 50% turnout compared with 74% and 60% in Scotland – and a puny set of powers. Unlike Holyrood, the assembly has never generated its own laws.In a set-up more akin to local government, its 60 members have been left to fill in the administrative blanks on laws from Westminster and Europe, spewing regulations in a process known as secondary legislation. They can flesh out policies, but cannot pass their own primary legislation.Despite the limited clout, the NAW has had its moments, including scrapping prescription charges; rejecting student top-up fees; free bus transport for the elderly, and appointing a children's commissioner.Much of the programme has sprung from the desire of Rhodri Morgan, the first minister, to be more left-wing than Tony Blair, and put "clear red water" between Cardiff Bay and London. But the public's perception remains one of relative impotence, and they have stayed away from the polls. Turnout fell from 46% in 1999 to just 38% in 2003, compared with 50% in Scotland.Only in health did the public feel the NAW had made a difference, even though NHS waiting lists were often appalling compared with England's. Now, less than two terms into the assembly's life, the 1998 act that created it is being replaced. The Government of Wales Bill, which made its way through the Commons hours before the Queen arrived to put a royal gloss on Welsh devolution, aims to address the failings of its predecessor by granting law-making powers.The enhanced powers will need the approval of the secretary of state, or for two-thirds of the AMs (Assembly Members) to back a public referendum on moving closer to Holyrood.Opposition parties smell another stitch-up based on Labour MPs refusing to devolve too much power in case it triggers a cut in their own numbers, as happened after the Scotland Act. Rhodri Morgan is refreshingly frank about Welsh Labour's desires. "We want to avoid one aspect of the Scottish model, namely the reduction in the number of Welsh MPs."We are trying to do this with minimal constitutional churn." In his defence, he says the bill will give far greater flexibility to the assembly, while wholesale devolution would be hard, given Wales does not have a separate legal system or control over policing.However Lord Dafyyd Elis-Thomas, presiding officer and Plaid AM, says the Scots model is inevitable.Ieuan Wyn Jones, Plaid leader, also looks jealously north. "We want to move to full legislative powers in one go. There's no appetite for all this 'incremental, we have to walk before we can run' Labour party nonsense."Even the Tories, who originally opposed an assembly, want a swifter move to full legislative powers. Nick Bourne, their assembly leader, was once a leading member of the 'no' campaign. "I was wrong," he confesses. Across the borders Scottish Parliament Preceded by cross-party Scottish constitutional convention referendum result: 74% support on 60% turnout. Opened 1999. Can pass primary legislation and vary income tax. Has powers over the legal system, police, health service, education, transport, culture, economic development, agriculture, local government. Holyrood opened September 2004 at cost of £431m. 129 MSPs. Government: Labour-LibDem coalition, first minister Jack McConnell. National Assembly for Wales No cross-party convention. Ground rules established by Labour instead. Referendum result: 50.3% support on 50% turnout. Opened 1999. Deals in developing policies on health, education, transport, culture, economic development, agriculture, local government and Welsh language. New Assembly building opened February 2006 at cost of £67m. 60 Assembly members. Government: Labour minority, first minister Rhodri Morgan.
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
1:28 PM
0
comments
PRESS RELEASE FROM INDEPENDENCE FIRST
“The Campaign for a Referendum on Scottish Independence.”
FROM: Joe Middleton (Press Officer)
media@independence1st.com
START:
Scottish Independence Party and Communist Party of Scotland support Independence First Campaign
The Scottish Independence Party (SIP) were amongst the first organisations to declare their support for Independence First's referendum campaign, however recently they have provided IF with a further message of support:
"The Scottish Independence Party fully supports the Independence First campaign. Independence First can be a great vehicle for uniting all pro-independence supporters regardless of their other views into one powerful voice focused on a clear, democratic and reasonable goal."
SIP is also going to send a delegation along to Independence First's AGM and has invited Independence First to attend their next meeting. They are also going to encourage SIP members to join IF and the new IF forum 'indyfirst'.
The Communist Party of Scotland (CPS) have also backed Independence First. Joe Middleton, Independence First Press Officer recently attended and spoke at a national council meeting of the CPS.
In a subsequent letter from the CPS their national Secretary, Eric Canning writes:
"Thank you for attending our National Council meeting... we found ourselves in complete agreement with your aims and greatly heartened to know that so many in Scotland are coming forward to support and work for the principle of Scottish Independence."
"We, therefore give our full support to the aims of Independence First - as we do to the Independence Convention - and are prepared to participate and help in any way we can."
Mr Middleton commented:
"When I spoke at their meeting I was very encouraged by the CPS's strong support for the Scottish independence cause. Independence First welcomes their support, and the support of the SIP, and we look forward to working together in the future."
END
http://www.independence1st.com/
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
9:11 PM
0
comments
Petition calls for more Scottish History
A petition urging a review of how Scottish literature and history is taught has gone before Holyrood's petitions committee. Launched by the Literature Forum for Scotland on St Andrew's Day last year, it has been signed by more than 1,500 writers and teachers.
It urged greater emphasis on Scottish culture in the education curriculum. However, committee convener Michael McMahon said teachers should not be prevented from choosing what to study.
The forum's campaign has received backing from novelists, poets, musicians and historians.
It said people without a knowledge of history and the arts could lack the confidence to relate to their own and to other cultures in a balanced way.
For some time Scotland's literary establishment is said to have felt that a greater emphasis is needed on the teaching of Scots literature and history at every level of education.
Principal petitioner Dr Donald Smith, convener of the Literature Forum for Scotland, said every citizen of Scotland is entitled to the opportunity to learn about Scotland's literature and history.
He said: "We want everybody in Scotland, not just in our schools, to be able to know something about its history, literature and languages.
"We don't believe at the moment that there's an overall plan or strategy in place to allow that to happen."
The formal petition reads: "Recognising that critical self-awareness of Scottish history, literature and languages is vital to a confident, successful and outward-looking Scotland, we submit that the present arrangements for the study of these disciplines at primary, secondary and tertiary levels are inadequate.
"We request that they be reviewed and effective frameworks established to ensure that all citizens of Scotland have the opportunity to understand these key aspects of their own society and culture."
However, Mr McMahon, petition committee convener, questioned whether it was wiser to allow teachers to decide what pupils should study. "If we become too prescriptive then we take away the ability of teachers to bring forward their own selves and their own art in teaching," he added.
The committee agreed to write to Education Minister Peter Peacock and Culture Minister Patricia Ferguson about the issue.
Members will also contact various education bodies, including the Scottish Higher Education Council, the Educational Institute of Scotland, Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education and universities.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4621762.stm
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
9:58 PM
0
comments
Salmond sets his sights on Gordon
SNP leader Alex Salmond is planning to fight the Gordon constituency in the 2007 Scottish Parliament elections. The Banff and Buchan MP would be taking on the current holder of the seat, Liberal Democrat MSP Nora Radcliffe.
At a meeting in Oldmeldrum on Sunday, Mr Salmond accepted an invitation from local activists to put his name forward for selection. A final decision on the nomination will be made by local nationalist members in the next few weeks.
Gordon is currently held by Ms Radcliffe and is seen by the Scottish National Party as its 18th "most-winnable" seat. Mr Salmond said he had considered fighting Aberdeen Central, a seat held by Scottish Executive minister Lewis MacDonald, but instead chose Gordon.
The constituency overlaps with his current Westminster seat, with some 10,000 of his present constituents in the Scottish parliamentary seat.
A further 6,000 of the Gordon electorate are also in the SNP-held Moray seat at Westminster.
Speaking at the SNP meeting, he said: "I said that I would stand for the Scottish Parliament in this corner of Scotland and that is exactly what I intend to do.
"The issues of the rural economy and services are vital across the north east of Scotland and these will be at the centre of our campaign. The SNP need to gain 20 new seats to win that election and become Scotland's leading party.
"The Gordon seat is the 18th most-winnable on that list of potential gains. Therefore, Gordon will be the crucible of the election. If we win Gordon then the SNP will be well on our way to a famous victory across Scotland. "
Mr Salmond said he expected a "tough fight". "I take nothing for granted, but we intend to win," he said. "I am looking forward enormously to this challenge as is every single local SNP activist."
He added: "Many thousands of my current constituents are already in this seat. The north east is not just my political base but my home and this decision gives me the opportunity to continue to represent this wonderful corner of Scotland."
Mr Salmond denied that present problems within the Liberal Democrats influenced his decision. He said it was gaining seats in the upcoming election not just holding seats currently held by the SNP. "They certainly haven't done themselves any favours by their shabby treatment of Charles Kennedy," he said.
"However my decision was made on the positive merits of what the SNP can do for the people of Aberdeenshire and Scotland not the failings of any other party."
Mr Salmond is also expected to head the north east SNP list, meaning he could return as an MSP without having to win the Gordon seat. At the last Holyrood election the SNP came third behind the Conservatives in Gordon.
Dunfermline by-election
The SNP has also named its candidate for the Westminster by-election triggered by the death of Labour MP Rachel Squire. Former councillor Douglas Chapman, who fought the seat of Dunfermline and West Fife in the May general election, was selected to contest the seat once again.
Mr Chapman, a former councillor for Rosyth West, has lived in Dunfermline for 15 years.
Ms Squire died on 5 January after a long battle against illness. Despite being unwell, she fought the general election in May and was returned for her Dunfermline and West Fife seat with an 11,562 majority.
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
1:19 PM
0
comments
http://www.swans.com/library/art12/joemid01.html
(Swans - January 16, 2006)
In "The Case For Scottish Independence" (Swans, November 7, 2005), Joe Davison seems to want independence on certain terms only, those terms being that it is an unambiguous socialist republic.
I am also a republican socialist and I agree that in the twenty-first century it would be absurd to have an unelected monarch at the head of a newly independent Scottish state. However, at the end of the day that is a decision for the Scottish people to make, after we have achieved our independence.
(see rest of article on the above link)
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
1:33 AM
0
comments
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
11:49 PM
0
comments
The Impeachment of George W. Bush:
People have begun to speak of impeaching President George W. Bush--not in hushed whispers but openly, in newspapers, on the Internet, in ordinary conversations and even in Congress. As a former member of Congress who sat on the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment proceedings against President Richard Nixon, I believe they are right to do so.
http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20060130&s=holtzman
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
11:09 PM
0
comments
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
10:56 PM
0
comments
Tony Blair should be impeached over the Iraq war, a former senior soldier said.
General Sir Michael Rose, former UN commander in Bosnia, said the Prime Minister had to be held to account.
"Certainly from a soldier's perspective there can't be any more serious decision taken by a prime minister than declaring war," he said.
"And then to go to war on what turns out to be false grounds is something that no one should be allowed to walk away from."
General Sir Michael told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that Mr Blair's actions were "somewhere in between" getting the politics wrong and actually acting illegally.
"The politics was wrong, that he rarely declared what his ultimate aims were, as far as we can see, in terms of harping continually on weapons of mass destruction when actually he probably had some other strategy in mind.
"And secondly, the consequences of that war have been quite disastrous both for the people of Iraq and also for the west in terms of our wider interests in the war against global terror."
The general accepted Parliament had endorsed the war, but he said that was because the Prime Minister had stressed the weapons of mass destruction argument.
© Copyright Press Association Ltd 2006, All Rights Reserved.
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
1:02 PM
0
comments
Your Letters January 06 2006
So might Shakespeare's Julius Caesar have encouraged us to face up to the Scottish enigma. Ours is not a crisis of identity – we have never lost it – but one of loyalty.
Scotland did unquestionably benefit from the Union, both initially and in its role of Empire-building. Now that pride, self-confidence and prosperity have been replaced with doubt and decline, we must ask ourselves whether the present arrangements are in the best interests of both parties.
From a purely economic standpoint Westminster would not like to lose its primary source of energy, but England, far more than Scotland, has an identity crisis. It has lost its way, torn between Europe and America, spending its dwindling resources on ill-conceived adventures like Trident and Iraq, at the same time creating a domestic society quite alien to the Scottish psyche.
A serious vote for Scottish independence is just what England needs to shake up its complacent and outdated Establishment. The old United Kingdoms of Scotland, England, Wales and Ireland can maintain open borders like the growing band of other Europeans – separation means no more than running our family affairs as befits our needs and aspirations. It's not nationalism, it's common sense.
R F Morrison, 29 Colquhoun Street, Helensburgh.
THERE are always two sides to consider in any argument, both of which usually make some valid points; this is certainly the case in the debate over the state of Scotland following Niall Ferguson's mainly prejudiced article (January 2).
One factor that is escaping serious discussion is the place of history education in Scottish schools, both state and "public"/private, for the history of a country is the history of its people and past achievements. Until relatively recently, the history taught was based on that of the British Empire with the emphasis being placed on the English input. Scotland was not the only Celtic-fringe nation to be so treated.
Undoubtedly, this historical educational fault has left a considerable imprint, one of basic subservience, on a great many Scots now holding senior positions within the Scottish and British politico-socio-economic scenes, so much so that those in thrall to the British scene frequently act against Scottish interests.
In this day and age, there is one undeniable truth in the democratic world and that is the fact that a country and its people will never realise their potential unless independence is achieved. This is becoming more obvious, on a daily basis, in Scotland.
Ian F M Saint-Yves, Dunvegan, School Brae, Whiting Bay, Arran.
In an otherwise entertaining letter on the Niall Ferguson controversy J M Stevenson, in a gratuitously offensive kind of way, criticises the action of Netherlee Church in raising a large sum of money to help provide shelter for "institutionalised women" in Sri Lanka (January 3). Stevenson professes that charity begins "at home". If, as he prefers, the sartorially unchallenged folk of Netherlee had opted to spend the money on a more local cause, then logic dictates that they and thousands of others like them throughout Niall Ferguson's "North Britain" should be honoured for denying relief to the hapless victims of tsunami, earthquake or, as in Netherlee's case vis-à-vis Sri Lanka, of brutally insensitive local traditions and practices in relation to mental healthcare.
At Netherlee we don't think that way. We oppose the medieval view that charity begins at home which resonates with the maxim we should ignore suffering and hardship outside Scotland – or outside Netherlee for that matter. We are proud of our 40-year link with St Andrew's Church in Colombo and we shall doubtless go on doing what we can to respond to the cries of help which we expect will continue unabated from our sister congregation in that unhappy country. If and when the same cry comes from the "lanes and alleys of Glasgow" then we shall do our best to make a response to that too. Indeed, we have done so throughout our 77-year history as the records will show.
Ironically, Ferguson chides modern Scotland for what he sees as its parochial, self-seeking and inward-looking obsession with itself – in stark contrast with its proud heritage of extra-boundary care and concern. Stevenson's sentiments – as they apply to the actions of churches like Netherlee – serve merely to advance Ferguson's wrongheaded claims in that regard.
Ronald Crawford, 50 Colonsay Drive, Newton Mearns.
http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/53770-print.shtml
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
9:34 PM
1 comments
The news that the SNP and Greens have been holding talks on possible future
coalitions is welcome. It makes sense that these parties who both seek
normal national status for Scotland should work together.
Both parties are of course already working together along with the Scottish
Socialist Party within the new Independence Convention.
While there are political differences amongst the Scottish parties there are
also very substantial areas of agreement, not least a concrete mutual
commitment to unilateral nuclear disarmament.
There is also common ground on a fair way to raise local government finance,
on free school meals and prescriptions and the genuine provision of
comprehensive education and a national health service, all of which are in
danger from the English orientated Conservative/Labour axis.
What unites all the Scottish parties of course is their desire for Scottish
independence and their rejection of the unionist parties cap on Scottish
ambitions.
Labour's Scottish vote is justifiably crumbling and they can't count on
their partners in the Lib-Dems saving them for ever as their coat is on a
shoogly nail as well.
As the UK looks at even more Conservative rule (I'd hesitate to describe
Tony Blair or his bedfellow Brown as Labour men) it becomes more and more
obvious that Scotland's natural left of centre political ethos is
incompatible with parties whose policy emanates from London.
It's rather unfortunate that England still appears to be stuck in an
imperial past where weak chinned public school boys act as proxies for 'Her
Majesty' and do nothing positive to change society. Nowadays British
politics doesn't even bear favourable comparison with the USA as the two
main parties have became just as indistinguishable and irrelevant as their
American counterparts.
However much the Palace of Westminster enjoys weakly sparring over nothing
the fact is that it's cozy vision of Blair and Cameron cuddling up to each
other across the despatch box is not shared by many people up here.
Personally I find nothing more horrifying than this pair of simpering
excuses for Thatcherism and I have a feeling I'm not alone.
Scotland's parties can make the break from the outdated British union and
the more they work together with one another the more likely it is that
their positive modern vision of independence will become reality. Let's
leave England to 'enjoy' their own unique brand of political soft soap, we
don't need it or want it and we never have.
Yours faithfully,
Joe Middleton
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
8:21 PM
0
comments
Tory MP hopes to drum up support for Union parade
IAN SWANSON SCOTTISH POLITICAL EDITOR
SHADOW Scottish Secretary David Mundell today called for a historical pageant in the Royal Mile to mark the 300th anniversary of the Union of Scotland and England next year.
He insisted that despite devolution, most Scots would want to celebrate the Union of the two countries' parliaments in 1707.
And he said the 2007 Scottish Parliament elections should not be allowed to put a damper on a proper commemoration.
Mr Mundell, Scotland's only Tory MP, said the celebrations for the anniversary of the Union of the Crowns in 2003 had been a non-event. And he added: "I think the Union of the parliaments is something we should celebrate.
"We are very lucky because we have still got the old parliament and we have the setting of the Royal Mile, so there is great scope to turn it into a pageant."
He added that the procession from the old Parliament House down the Mile before the opening of the Holyrood building in 2004
had been "quite a success".
Mr Mundell said the anniversary should be marked in London as well, perhaps with a ceremony at the Houses of Parliament and an address from the Queen.
He acknowledged his call for a major celebration of the Union would antagonise some Scots. But he insisted: "It is a minority of people who want to live in an independent Scotland. I don't think we should concede to them.
"What concerns me is 2007 is an election year. That was used as an excuse in 2003 for not doing very much. I hope the same excuse doesn't prevail this time."
Edinburgh North and Leith Labour MP Mark Lazarowicz raised the issue in the Commons in October, arguing the Act of Union marked the foundation of Great Britain and no-one could deny its historical significance.
He was told by junior Scotland Office minister David Cairns that discussions were ongoing with the Scottish Executive and other departments, but it was too early to put forward definitive plans.
SNP leader Alex Salmond intervened to complain the Scotland Office had done nothing to commemorate the 700th anniversary of the death of William Wallace.
And he said it would be strange to have "a subsidised booze-up" to celebrate 1707. He suggested the minister should "do what he does best - nothing at all".
The 2003 celebrations to mark the 400th anniversary of the Union of the Crowns included an event in Berwick-upon-Tweed, featuring hundreds of costumed musketeers and pikemen.
There was also a lavish £33,000 dinner hosted by the First Minister and visits by the Queen. But leading SNP MSP Alex Neil claimed the Queen had been among those eager to keep the 2003 celebrations low-key to avoid stirring up nationalist sentiment.
He said he expected more effort to mark the 1707 anniversary, but added: "The only celebration I would be interested in is if people voted for independence in 2007. The Union of Parliaments came about as a result of skullduggery and treachery by the 'parcel of rogues in the nation' and it will be the current-day parcel of rogues that want to celebrate the Union."
A spokesman for the Scottish Executive said the Union was an important event in the country's history and would be marked in an appropriate way, but discussions were still at an early stage.
http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=20032006
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
11:38 PM
0
comments
SNP in talks with Greens
The SNP have held talks with the Greens on parliamentary co-operation following the next Scottish election.
Nationalists are aiming to be the biggest Holyrood party in 2007, while the Greens have set out hopes to form part of a power-sharing Executive.
But SNP leader Alex Salmond pulled back from suggestions that the talks were coalition negotiations telling BBC Scotland: "The SNP intends to become the largest party in the parliament.
"The Greens I'm sure will be a parliamentary force in that parliament and you would expect the parties to be preparing for the situation where we'll be able to replace the current discredited Labour Executive with a different one."
But Mr Salmond stressed that talks were at an early stage, adding: "They were looking at areas of parliamentary co-operation. That would be more accurate than talking about coalitions."
The SNP and Greens agree in a number of policy areas such as nuclear power, rendition flights and Scottish independence, but the Greens may clash with the SNP's economic growth strategy because of environmental concerns.
Mr Salmond said: "Clearly there are areas where the two parties don't agree but there are areas where we do agree. Disagreements can either be put to one side or sidelined."
"Coalition is only one possibility," he added.
"There are areas of parliamentary co-operation that stop short of coalitions."
Green MSP Patrick Harvie said: "Alex Salmond's approach is recognising that the Greens are a serious force in Scottish politics, that we're going to be on the political map for some time to come and that where we have common ground, it's good to talk.
© Copyright Press Association Ltd 2006, All Rights Reserved.
http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=20162006
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
11:35 PM
0
comments
http://news.scotsman.com/politics.cfm?id=11982006
Blair backs down over incapacity benefit
JAMES KIRKUP WESTMINSTER EDITOR
THE government backed away from radical plans to reform incapacity benefit yesterday, signalling that there will be no attempt to cut the £8 billion bill for the welfare payments.
Labour MPs had threatened a rebellion after suggestions from Downing Street of a move to reduce the total amount of money paid to the 2.7 million incapacity benefit claimants.
But ministers yesterday said there was no longer any question of cutting payments made to claimants. Suggestions that time limits or means tests could be placed on the benefit are also set to be dropped.
Instead, new plans to cut the incapacity benefit lists are expected to focus on expanding pilot projects that effectively pay claimants more money as an incentive to leave the welfare system and get a job.
The so-called Pathways to Work programme penalises claimants who do not attend employment-based interviews with officials, but it also offers an extra £40-a-week payment to those who get jobs.
John Hutton, the Work and Pensions Secretary, said there was no question of imposing big cuts in the incapacity benefits paid to existing claimants. "I did not come into politics to make poor people poorer," he said.
Mr Hutton has written to the 100 MPs whose constituencies have the most incapacity benefit claimants, reassuring them about the government's plans.
An official spokesman for Tony Blair, the Prime Minister, also suggested that there was no longer any target of cutting the overall incapacity benefit bill, although falling numbers of claimants would reduce costs eventually.
"The primary purpose is to get people back to work," the spokesman said. "Given the demographics, that in itself is right for the economy."
Three of the ten constituencies with the most claimants are in Glasgow. Glasgow East tops the list with 11,300 people claiming incapacity benefits.
Ian Davidson, the Labour MP whose Glasgow South West seat comes 13th in the list with 8,600 claimants, said he was satisfied the government had backed down from its initial plans for widespread cuts in payments. "We want to make sure that this is not a means of saving money for the Treasury, nor a means of punishing those who are in difficulties," he said.
This article: http://news.scotsman.com/politics.cfm?id=11982006
Last updated: 04-Jan-06 01:12 GMT
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
12:12 AM
0
comments
The Scots who turned the world upside down
BILLY KAY
January 04 2006
http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/53578.html
"Fredome is a noble thing . . . "
John Barbour's famous words from The Brus resound across the centuries and
the ideal of freedom born in this period became engrained in the Scottish
psyche, affecting everyone brought up as a Scot.
Over four centuries later, Robert Burns still testified to the emotive power
resonating from those days: "The story of Wallace poured a Scottish
prejudice in my veins which will boil along there till the flood gates of
life shut in eternal rest."
I am convinced that in the great period of European nationalism of the late
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, it was this Scottish heritage that
galvanised people such as James Boswell to adopt the cause of Corsica,
George Gordon, Lord Byron, to die for the liberation of Greece and Lord
Cochrane to fight for freedom in South America.
Cochrane was called Le Loup de Mer, the Sea Wolf, by his admirer Napoleon,
and El Diablo - the Devil - by his enemy General Pezuela, the Spanish
viceroy of Peru. To the colonial powers of South America, Spain and
Portugal, he was regarded as an unprincipled and dangerous mercenary, yet he
rejected a far more lucrative commission from Spain itself.
In his day he was regarded by the British establishment as a dangerous
radical, but his exploits as a serial liberator in South America and Greece
thrilled everyone thirled to the concept of freedom. A contemporary who
witnessed his exploits in Chile, Maria Graham, wrote: "He is doing honour to
his native land, by supporting that cause which used to be hers, and in
after-ages his name will be among those of the household gods of the
Chilenos".
Thomas Cochrane, 10th Earl of Dundonald, arrived in Chile with his wife and
sons in November 1818. He caused a stir in Valparaiso when he hosted a St
Andrew's night ball dressed as a Highland chieftain. His strategy initially
was to stage small-scale coastal raids on Spanish forts and procure captured
treasure. But he was also aware that he had to inflict mortal blows to
Spanish power to win control of the sea, and at Valdivia in Chile and Callao
in Peru he achieved this with spectacular success.
At Valdivia, a stronghold consisting of a number of separate forts, Cochrane
put in 300 men against a garrison of 1300. Before launching the attack, he
dismissed the small problem that his guns had been rendered useless when his
ammunition got soaked, by telling his men that their reliance on the bayonet
that night was in their favour as it gave them the element of surprise, and
the Spaniards had a "rooted aversion" to cold steel.
After Callao, Cochrane was the undisputed master of the Pacific, with
Peruvian and Chilean independence guaranteed. These raids are still
celebrated and commemorated as essential turning points in their respective
national histories and the sites are places of pilgrimage for Chileans and
Peruvians to this day.
Cochrane thenwent on to Brazil, where he similarly achieved spectacular
results against the Portuguese. In Scotland, he arrived home a hero and when
he appeared in an Edinburgh theatre on October 3, 1825, the whole audience
rose to give him an ovation.
He is buried in Westminster Abbey. I have never visited his tombstone, but I
have seen photographs of him lovingly taken by Carlos Arredondo, a Chilean
musician in exile here in Scotland. As is always the case with history, the
modern echoes are compelling. Carlos's life proves that liberty, once won,
has to be constantly fought for. He is aware that the navy founded by
Cochrane was engaged in gross abuses of human rights during the Pinochet
era.
Knowing Cochrane's humanitarian reputation, Carlos believes that the admiral
would have abhorred the excesses of the navy under the fascists, and wants
to reclaim him for the Chilean people.
As a Scots-Chileno himself now, Carlos sees Cochrane as a symbol of the best
of both his homelands and as an icon whose example can help re-establish
real freedom for the people of Chile.
James Boswell is one of many Scots who became involved in other people's
liberation struggles, yet had seriously ambivalent feelings when it came to
his own country's history of independence and union. Although he undoubtedly
suffered from the Scottish cringe, he regarded himself as a Scottish patriot
and it is this feeling for Scottish history that attracted him to the
Corsican cause.
Nowhere is this stated more clearly than on the title page of his book, An
Account of Corsica, the Journal of a Tour to that Island, and Memoir of
Pascal Paoli, published in 1768, leading with the famous words from the
Declaration of Arbroath, "We fight not for glory, nor for wealth nor
honours; but only and alone we fight for Freedom".
But why were these men so drawn to become deeply involved in other people's
liberation struggles? Was their attraction to the cause an extension or a
sublimation of their feelings for Scotland, possibly an expiation of guilt
as they saw the distinctiveness of their own country being eroded in the
eighteenth and nineteenth century?
On the Grand Tour, Boswell was constantly in touch with home. From Avignon
to Rome, he came across illustrious Jacobite exiles. In the university
library in Leipzig, he also discovered a copy of the Declaration of Arbroath
and regaled astonished professors with declamations of his favourite
passages.
"They were struck with the noble sentiments of liberty of the old Scots and
they expressed their regret at the shameful Union. I felt true patriot
sorrow. Oh, infamous rascals, who sold the honour of your country to a
nation against which our ancestors supported themselves with so much glory.
But I say no more, only alas, poor Boswell was 24 years old and had the
gallus brass-necked cheek of youth as an ally when he succeeded in getting
himself invitations to meet Voltaire and Rousseau. It was Rousseau who told
Boswell of the Corsican struggle for freedom and of the nobility of its
leader, General Paoli. Boswell resolved to go there and tell their story to
the world.
The Corsicans had been dominated by the Republic of Genoa since medieval
times but had begun their struggle to free themselves more than 35 years
before Boswell's arrival.
Indeed, Boswell was able to travel freely because there was a lull in the
fighting, and with tensions relaxed, both General Paoli and the Corsican
people were open to this foreign writer engaged in their fight. He repaid
their hospitality by making their cause famous throughout Europe.
In British politics, like Lord Cochrane, Byron was a political Radical and
Whig, yet his romantic love of things Scottish attracted him to a High Tory
like Sir Walter Scott and they became firm friends despite political
differences.
By the early 1820s Byron was looking around for something momentous to
engage himself with and at one point he had discussions with people who were
involved in Símon Bolívar's anti-colonial movement in South America. When
his friend Hobhouse of the London Greek Committee suggested that he would be
an important focus for the Greek cause, if he would consent to be on the
ground there, he accepted and made plans for departure.
There is a painting by Theodoros Vrizakis which commemorates his arrival in
Missolonghi in January, 1821. Here, Byron alights wrapped in a tartan plaid
and carrying a Homeric helmet. He had commissioned both for his trip to
Greece - he had enough tartan to swathe his horse as well - and was aware
that these romantic symbols of Greek and Highland warriors would strike the
right heroic chord and help galvanise the disparate forces of opposition to
Turkey.
It is entirely possible that it was Cochrane's example which inspired Byron
to join the liberation struggle of Greece against Turkey. Amazingly,
following Byron's death, it was Cochrane himself in 1825 who continued the
fight as First Admiral to the Greek fleet. The invitation to him to take up
the Greek cause came via the same London Greek Committee which had
originally approached Byron. Its leaders included the Radical Scots MP
Joseph Hume, whose son Allan Octavian Hume went on to found Indian National
Congress, the main motor for India's struggle for independence in the
twentieth century.
We could analyse the diverse factors which motivated all of these kenspeckle
characters till the kye comes hame, but let us not lose sight of their
unifying characteristics - they were all steeped in the Scottish traditions
of social progress via education and the Enlightenment and they had an
emotional attachment to the struggles of Bruce and Wallace.
Both traditions had a huge impact on the world. The story of Bruce inspired
Poland at the time of partition. Wallace was a hero of Garibaldi at the time
of the Italian Risorgimento. The tune of Scots Wha Hae was played at the
lifting of the English siege of Orléans when Joan of Arc and the Scots of La
Garde Écossaise liberated France. David Livingstone was known to sing the
song to revive his spirit and he was called Africa's first freedom fighter
by Kenneth Kaunda. "Now's the day and now's the hour" were the words on the
proclamation that inspired the American revolt against Mexico in Texas.
Robert Louis Stevenson was engaged in the cause of Samoa. The father of the
Norwegian independence movement was W K Christie and its cultural hero was
Edvard Grieg, both children of the Scottish diaspora.
And, of course, there's Corsica, Greece, India, Chile, Peru and Brazil. All
of their liberation movements have a proud pedigree rooted in the Scottish
experience of a people who know that Fredome is, and always will be, a noble
thing. Scotland!"
Billy Kay's three-part Radio Scotland series, Fredome is a Noble Thing,
begins tomorrow at 11.30am and is repeated at half past midnight, then again
on Sunday after 5pm.
Scots and revolution
1729 Corsicans begin a 44-year struggle against the oppression of the
Republic of Genoa
1768 James Boswell's An Account of Corsica, the Journal of a Tour to that
Island and Memoir of Pascal Paoli published
1768-1789 Corsica comes under French control, and remains so today
1818 Admiral Cochrane arrives in Chile. Declaration of Chilean Independence
1820 Cochrane defeats the Spaniards at Valdivia in Chile and at Callao in
Peru
1821 Independence of Peru
1822 Declaration of Brazilian Independence
1823 Cochrane defeats the Portuguese in Brazil
1821 Beginning of the Greek War of Independence against the Turks
1823 Byron arrives in Greece to join the struggle
1824 Byron dies in Missolonghi
1825 Cochrane takes command of the Greek navy in the struggle against the
Turks
1832 Greek Independence is guaranteed in the Treaty of Constantinople
1883-1885 Allan Octavian Hume founds the Indian National Congress
1947 India achieves independence
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
11:51 PM
0
comments

SNP calls for clarification on anti-terror bill
The SNP is demanding clarification from Scottish secretary Alistair Darling about the Scots law advice given for the anti-terror bill.
Party leader Alex Salmond claims he has received a letter from the lord advocate in which he makes clear that he was not asked and did not offer advice to the home secretary on the Scots Law implications of the bill. Home secretary Charles Clarke has said that the Scotland's top government legal adviser had not been consulted on the question of 90 days detention clause which resulted in the government¹s first defeat in the Commons.
The SNP now say it has now been confirmed that there was no consultation beyond official level on any aspect of the bill, including the controversy on the implications for free speech and civil liberties. Salmond said: "This is a sorry state of affairs for Scotland and Scots law. If the home secretary had not sought the advice of the attorney general on the terror bill, then he would have had to resign. "The UK has two distinct and equal legal systems, and the fact the Home Office did not ask for the view of any Scottish law officer on this crucial piece of legislation beggars belief. "However, it also seems that the advocate general, who is supposed to speak for Scots law in Westminster, was asleep at her post. "The secretary of state for Scotland doesn't know while the first minister isn't rated, leaving the lord advocate to pass the buck back to the advocate general. "The fact is that Scots law has been sidelined by the Home Office and our law officers were silent bystanders. What a sorry state of affairs. "The Scottish secretary needs to clarify exactly what happened over this important piece of legislation and to guarantee a full role for Scotland's law officers from this point on."
Posted by
Joe Middleton
at
10:55 PM
0
comments
I am Scots not British. Please retweet if you agree. #indyref #yesscotland #snp #scotland
— Joe Middleton (@freescotlandnow) February 28, 2013